3
7.9
已完结
鬼火1963
7.9
上映时间:2025年03月03日
主演:莫里斯·罗内,莱娜·斯克尔拉,伊冯娜·克莱什,于贝尔·德尚,让-保罗·穆利诺,莫娜·多尔,皮埃尔·蒙科尔比耶,勒内·迪皮伊,贝尔纳·蒂费纳,贝尔纳·诺埃尔,乌尔苏拉·库布勒,让娜·莫罗,阿兰·莫泰,罗曼·布泰耶,雅克·塞雷,亚历山德拉·斯图尔特,亨利·赛尔,达琳·莱卓提姆斯
简介:花花公子阿兰(莫里斯·荣内特 Maurice Ronet 饰)在疗养院中进行了六个月的戒酒治疗。疗养即将结束,但他并不能肯定自己是否痊愈。他通过看书、抽烟、写日记、把玩手枪、剪贴报纸上关于死亡的报道来平复内心的恐惧与忧伤。他和美国的妻子分居,同时又与妻子的朋友莉迪亚(莱娜·斯克尔拉 Léna Skerla 饰)纠缠在一起。莉迪亚要求阿兰与妻子摊牌,与她生活在一起,但阿兰拒绝了。回到疗养院,阿兰在医生的鼓励下决定试着重新融入社会,接触自己的朋友们。在巴黎,他开始拜访昔日的朋友,却发现今时的人们全都背叛了从前的社会观、政治观,变得矫揉造作,没有人能够理解他,甚至对他进行明嘲暗讽。阿兰心中刚刚燃起的积极信念彻底地被摧毁了,他无法掩饰对这个世界的厌恶,再次陷入绝望之中。阿兰最后一次把自己灌醉,醒来之后,收拾完房间和行李,接了一个电话,读完一本费兹罗杰的小说,他拿出手枪朝着自己的心脏开了一枪。  本片获第28届威尼斯电影节评审团特别奖。
3
已完结
鬼火1963
主演:莫里斯·罗内,莱娜·斯克尔拉,伊冯娜·克莱什,于贝尔·德尚,让-保罗·穆利诺,莫娜·多尔,皮埃尔·蒙科尔比耶,勒内·迪皮伊,贝尔纳·蒂费纳,贝尔纳·诺埃尔,乌尔苏拉·库布勒,让娜·莫罗,阿兰·莫泰,罗曼·布泰耶,雅克·塞雷,亚历山德拉·斯图尔特,亨利·赛尔,达琳·莱卓提姆斯
3
8.3
500亿欧元交易弊案
局外人
8.3
上映时间:03月25日
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼
简介:《放牛班的春天》法国导演克里斯托夫·巴拉蒂执导,凯萨奖男星亚瑟·杜彭主演。  电影改编自真实事件,九年前震惊全球的「500亿欧元交易弊案」,描述2008年时,31岁的巴黎交易员杰宏柯维耶在未经授权下进行金融买卖,涉及的投资金额高达500亿欧元,几乎导致法国兴业银行(Société Générale)倒闭,更引发全球金融大暴泻。这位人称「魔鬼交易员」的柯维耶,如何偷天换日、秘密进行500亿欧元的交易?由于金额太过庞大,让人怀疑内情不单纯,不仅国际议论纷纷,更成为金融机构的职训教材。  拜该案知名度之赐,《巴黎交易员》各国版权狂卖,不仅电影获伊斯坦堡金桔奖提名最佳影片,导演巴拉蒂更获好莱坞报导讚誉「挖掘出事件的娱乐性」。  剧情讲述,杰宏来自布列塔尼,他幸运挤身法兴银行,在获主管同侪欣赏下,摇身成为巴黎交易员。人生鲤跃龙门,眼界自此大开,而他在股价期货交易赚到的钱,更远超过父亲几十个劳碌的人生。  杰宏的父亲是个锅炉工人,母亲则是理髮师。顶著金融硕士头衔的他,彷彿有弹指魔法,总能帮银行赚进惊人利润,却也逐渐沉迷于一场场的金钱游戏。杰宏每投必中宛若神助,在银行默许下,他越发大胆展开最疯狂交易,不仅买卖金额逐步超越权限,投资金额更超乎银行股本,导致不可收拾局面,引发那斯达克、道琼欧盟指数崩盘暴泻,银行跟著摇摇欲坠。  银行愤怒对杰宏提出控告,使他面临49亿欧元的天价求偿!这位「魔鬼交易员」如何能瞒天过海、暗地进行500亿欧元的投资?他坚持没有私吞一毛钱,但凭空消失的钜款,究竟去了哪裡?一场关乎人性与欲望的金钱游戏于是登场。
3
500亿欧元交易弊案
局外人
主演:亚瑟·杜彭,弗朗索瓦-格扎维埃·德梅松,萨巴纳·奥扎尼
3
7.1
已完结
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
7.1
上映时间:2025年03月03日
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
3
已完结
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
3
7.1
正片
柔肤
7.1
上映时间:2025年03月03日
主演:让·德赛利,弗朗索瓦·朵列,内莉·贝内德蒂,丹尼尔·塞卡尔迪,洛朗斯·巴迪,菲利普·迪马,葆拉·艾曼努尔,莫里斯·加瑞尔,萨比娜·奥德潘,Dominique Lacarrière,让·拉尼尔,皮埃尔·里施
简介:Pierre Lachenay(让·德赛利 Jean Desailly 饰)是一个已婚的作家和杂志主编,在一次出差时,他被美丽的空姐 Nicole(弗朗索瓦·朵列 Françoise Dorléac 饰)所吸引。碰巧的是,两人竟在同一间酒店见面了。Pierre邀请Ni cole出去喝东西,两人聊了一夜,不久,两人便爱得无法自拔。Pierre要回巴黎了,Nicole在他的本子上留了电话号码。回到家的Pierre瞒着妻子Franca (Nelly Benedetti 饰)偷偷和Nicole联系。他更主动申请出差去Reims,只为了能带上Nicole,暂时远离他的妻子和女儿。在Reims,Pierre为了讲座忙得不可开交,和Nicole闹了矛盾,两人提前离开了Reims。碰巧Pierre的妻子打电话到Reims,发现Pierre已经离开,开始怀疑Pierre。后来,Nicole厌倦了这段关系,离开了Pierre。而另一边,Franca则准备和Pierre离婚。直到Franca发现了Pierre和Nicole的亲密合照,愤怒和嫉妒促使她拿出猎枪,走到街上去寻找Pierre,以了结这一切......
3
正片
柔肤
主演:让·德赛利,弗朗索瓦·朵列,内莉·贝内德蒂,丹尼尔·塞卡尔迪,洛朗斯·巴迪,菲利普·迪马,葆拉·艾曼努尔,莫里斯·加瑞尔,萨比娜·奥德潘,Dominique Lacarrière,让·拉尼尔,皮埃尔·里施
3
7.5
正片
旋转门国语
7.5
上映时间:2025年03月03日
主演:Monique Spaziani,Gabriel Arcand,Miou-Miou
简介:

这部情感剧以 20 世纪 20 年代末期魁北克的一个小镇为背景,讲述了塞莱斯特·博蒙特 (Celeste Beaumont) 的生活和事迹。塞莱斯特·博蒙特是一位才华横溢的年轻钢琴家,她凭借在无声电影中弹奏钢琴的天赋,在镇上的电影院声名鹊起。笨拙的皮埃尔·布劳德尔 (Pierre Blaudell) 是她最大的粉丝,并最终娶了她。此后不久,她生下了皮埃尔,皮埃尔参军入伍。她坚持要和他一起去基地,而他爱管闲事、傲慢的父母坚持让她把儿子交给他们。皮埃尔在战争中阵亡,塞莱斯特逃到纽约,在那里找到了一份稳定的工作,当一名爵士钢琴家。她与一位黑人音乐家结为终生伴侣,并在日记中记录了她的经历,并在儿子长大后将日记传给了儿子。她的儿子成为了一名画家,而他自己的儿子安托万长大后,给他读了塞莱斯特的故事,塞莱斯特是他祖母。安托万对此十分好奇,他前往大苹果城,希望能找到她。这部电影是一部情感剧,讲述了弗朗索瓦·梅特 (François Méthé) 饰演的安托万 (Antoine) 如何发现自己的血统。这部电影在加拿大和 1988 年的戛纳电影节上获得了许多奖项。当时年仅 11 岁的弗朗索瓦·梅特 (François Méthé) 拍完这部电影后就再也没有演过戏。来自 IMDb:一位安静的画家与妻子分居一年,收到了母亲寄来的一个手提箱,他从婴儿时期就再也没有见过母亲。他认为母亲把他抛弃给了富有的祖父母。手提箱里装着一些纪念品和一本日记,这是一封写给他的长信,多年来,她详细讲述了母亲的青年时代、她在电影院担任钢琴师的第一份工作、有声电影的出现、她的婚姻以及他如何与祖父母一起生活。当他阅读这些材料时,母亲的故事变得栩栩如生,他的儿子安托万(大约 10 或 12 岁)试图通过亲自动手来打破父亲的沉默和悲伤。

3
正片
旋转门国语
主演:Monique Spaziani,Gabriel Arcand,Miou-Miou